首页> 外文OA文献 >Randomized comparison of bleeding patterns in women using a combined contraceptive vaginal ring or a low-dose combined oral contraceptive on a menstrually signaled regimen
【2h】

Randomized comparison of bleeding patterns in women using a combined contraceptive vaginal ring or a low-dose combined oral contraceptive on a menstrually signaled regimen

机译:经月经信号疗法使用组合避孕阴道环或小剂量联合口服避孕药的女性出血模式的随机比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare bleeding patterns for 12months continuous use of a contraceptive ring [contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR)] and pill [combined oral contraceptive (COC)] on a menstrually signaled regimen and the effectiveness of 4days "treatment withdrawal" to stop bleeding.\udSTUDY DESIGN: Women, 66 to each group, were randomized to continuous use of a CVR (15mcg ethinyl estradiol/150mcg etonogestrel) or a low-dose pill (20mcg ethinyl estradiol/100mcg levonorgestrel) for 360days on a menstrually signaled regimen. Bleeding/spotting days, daily use of ring or pill, was recorded. Endpoint was the total number of bleeding/spotting days for each method over four 90-day reference periods (RP) plus the analysis of bleeding patterns using modified World Health Organization criteria.\udRESULTS: There was a reduction in the mean (±S.D.) number of bleeding/spotting days from RP1 (CVR 14.2±10; pill 16.6±10.9) to RP4 (CVR 8.8±9.6; pill 8.8±9.1). Fifteen percent of CVR and 4% COC users experienced amenorrhea or infrequent bleeding throughout the study. Amenorrhea increased over time (RP1 vs. RP4: CVR 10% vs. 21% and COC 2% vs. 30%). Compliance with the menstrually signaled regimen was poor. Ceasing hormones for 4days stopped a bleeding episode within 5days in the majority of episodes and many stopped spontaneously.\udCONCLUSION: Bleeding patterns with continuous use of the CVR and COC are similar and improve over 1year of use. The unpredictability, but short duration, of bleeding episodes should be stressed during counseling.\udIMPLICATION: This information for clinicians and women about breakthrough bleeding patterns with use of a CVR or combined pill over 12months using a menstrually signaled regimen will give women an indication of what to expect with continuous use.
机译:目的:比较经月经信号疗法连续12个月使用避孕环[避孕阴道环(CVR)]和药丸[联合口服避孕药(COC)] 12个月的出血模式,以及“停药” 4天以止血的有效性。 \研究设计:每组66名妇女被随机分配在经月经信号疗法上连续360天使用CVR(15mcg乙炔雌二醇/ 150mcg依托孕甾酮)或低剂量药丸(20mcg乙炔雌二醇/ 100mcg左炔诺孕酮)。记录出血/散斑天数,每天服用环或丸。终点是每种方法在四个90天参考期内(RP)的总出血/抽血天数,再加上使用修改后的世界卫生组织标准进行的出血类型分析。\ udRESULTS:平均值(±SD)降低了从RP1(CVR 14.2±10;药丸16.6±10.9)到RP4(CVR 8.8±9.6;药丸8.8±9.1)的出血/斑点天数。在整个研究过程中,有15%的CVR和4%的COC用户经历了闭经或不经常出血。闭经随着时间增加(RP1对RP4:CVR 10%对21%,COC 2%对30%)。经期信号疗法的依从性差。持续4天的激素停止治疗在大多数发作后的5天内停止了出血发作,并且许多发作是自发停止的。\ ud结论:连续使用CVR和COC的出血模式相似,并且在使用1年后有所改善。在咨询过程中,应强调出血事件的不可预测性,但持续时间短。\ udimplication:有关临床医生和女性的信息,包括在使用经月经信号疗法的12个月内使用CVR或联合药的突破性出血模式,将为女性提供持续使用会有什么期望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号